INNOVATIV
Band 79: Janet Wagner Band 78: Philip Franklin Orr Band 77: Carina Dony Band 76:
Linda Freyberg
Sabine Wolf (Hrsg.)
Band 75: Denise Rudolph Band 74: Sophia Paplowski Band 73: Carmen Krause Band 72:
Katrin Toetzke
Dirk Wissen
Band 71: Rahel Zoller Band 70: Sabrina Lorenz Band 69: Jennifer Hale Band 68:
Linda Schünhoff
Benjamin Flämig
Band 67:
Wilfried Sühl-Strohmenger
Jan-Pieter Barbian
Band 66: Tina Schurig Band 65: Christine Niehoff Band 64: Eva May Band 63: Eva Bunge Band 62: Nathalie Hild Band 61: Martina Haller Band 60: Leonie Flachsmann Band 59: Susanne Göttker Band 58: Georg Ruppelt Band 57: Karin Holste-Flinspach Band 56: Rafael Ball Band 55: Bettina Schröder Band 54: Florian Hagen Band 53: Anthea Zöller Band 52: Ursula Georgy Band 51: Ursula Jaksch Band 50: Hermann Rösch (Hrsg) Band 49: Lisa Maria Geisler Band 48: Raphaela Schneider Band 47: Eike Kleiner
Bestellen Sie jetzt online!
16. Juli 2026
  WEITERE NEWS
Aktuelles aus
L
ibrary
Essentials

In der Ausgabe 05/2026 (Juni/Juli 2026) lesen Sie u.a.:

  • Bürgerforum fordert mehr Medienbildung, Plattformregeln und lokale Öffentlichkeit
  • Jugendliche wollen besseren Schutz, aber keine einfachen Social-Media-Verbote
  • Digitale Langzeit­archi­vierung braucht klare Regeln
  • KI-Chatbots werden Teil der wissenschaftlichen Informationssuche
  • Offene Infrastrukturen für
    wissenschaftliche Informationssysteme
  • Warum die Debatte über KI-Texte
    zu kurz greift
  • Lesen als Grundlage
    demokratischer Resilienz
  • Erfundene Quellen
  • US-Bibliotheken neue Lieferwege
  • Warum Hardcover mehr sind
    als schöne Schutzumschläge
  • Lesen auf Papier oder auf dem Bildschirm?
  • Bibliotheksverbände fordern neue
    E-Book-Modelle von großen Verlagen
u.v.m.
  fachbuchjournal
2009 bis 2023

Nature Index expands to applied and social sciences
with release of 2026 Research Leaders tables

Nature Index now covers seven subject areas and adopts a recalibrated methodology

Today, the Nature Index has introduced updates to broaden its disciplinary coverage and refine its methodology with the release of the 2026 Research Leaders tables, marking a major step in the evolution of the database since its launch in 2014. The 2026 tables (based on full year 2025 data) show that China continues to lead globally and the East Asia region in general has outperformed others in the Nature Index.

For the first time, the Nature Index incorporates 17 applied-science journals and one conference and 15 social-science journals into the database. These new journals were selected following a global survey of more than 4,000 researchers on where they would choose to publish their most significant work. The Nature Index now tracks 177 journals plus one conference across seven subject areas, with 84% of them published outside Springer Nature.

The Nature Index has also adopted an article-level subject classification system, rather than assigning subject areas based on a journal’s primary discipline. Categorizing each article’s subject individually helps to provide a more accurate reflection of disciplinary coverage in the database.

To support comparison, articles from the newly added journals have been incorporated for 2024 and 2025, and the updated subject classification has been applied retrospectively across the database.

“With expanded disciplinary coverage and a recalibrated methodology, the Nature Index now provides a more comprehensive and precise view of high-quality research output,” said Simon Baker, Chief Editor, Nature Index. “In terms of the results, we are continuing to see extremely strong performance from China, while there is also evidence that the wider East Asia region is growing output at a faster rate than Europe and North America.”

Key regional highlights:

  • China remains the world’s leading contributing country, with research output rising 22.4% from 2024 to 2025, and it is the only county in the top ten to achieve double-digit growth.

  • Japan, South Korea and India all rank among the global top ten, with Japan and South Korea each recording almost 10% growth in research output, outpacing the Western countries in the top ten.

  • The remaining countries in the global top ten include four European nations and two North American nations. US and Germany are among the top five across all seven subject areas, with the US leading in health sciences and social sciences, and the UK ranking in the top five in all areas except chemistry.

Institutional performance:

  • The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) retains its global No. 1 position overall and across most subject areas except health sciences and social sciences. Nine of the top ten institutions are based in China, up from eight last year, with Zhejiang University rising to No. 2.

  • Harvard University moves to No. 3 overall but leads in health and social sciences, and nine of the top ten institutions in social sciences are US-based.

  • In biological sciences, Harvard ranks No. 2, and the Max Planck Society ranks No. 3. European institutions perform strongly in physical sciences, with four in the top ten, including Max Planck Society (No. 2) and Italy’s National Institute for Nuclear Physics (No. 4).

  • The Helmholtz Association for Nuclear Physics ranks No. 4 in Earth & environmental sciences.

All data and analysis for this year’s Research Leaders can be found here. The data is based on full-year 2025 data.

https://www.nature.com/nature-index/research-leaders/2026/