INNOVATIV
Band 79: Janet Wagner Band 78: Philip Franklin Orr Band 77: Carina Dony Band 76:
Linda Freyberg
Sabine Wolf (Hrsg.)
Band 75: Denise Rudolph Band 74: Sophia Paplowski Band 73: Carmen Krause Band 72:
Katrin Toetzke
Dirk Wissen
Band 71: Rahel Zoller Band 70: Sabrina Lorenz Band 69: Jennifer Hale Band 68:
Linda Schünhoff
Benjamin Flämig
Band 67:
Wilfried Sühl-Strohmenger
Jan-Pieter Barbian
Band 66: Tina Schurig Band 65: Christine Niehoff Band 64: Eva May Band 63: Eva Bunge Band 62: Nathalie Hild Band 61: Martina Haller Band 60: Leonie Flachsmann Band 59: Susanne Göttker Band 58: Georg Ruppelt Band 57: Karin Holste-Flinspach Band 56: Rafael Ball Band 55: Bettina Schröder Band 54: Florian Hagen Band 53: Anthea Zöller Band 52: Ursula Georgy Band 51: Ursula Jaksch Band 50: Hermann Rösch (Hrsg) Band 49: Lisa Maria Geisler Band 48: Raphaela Schneider Band 47: Eike Kleiner
Bestellen Sie jetzt online!
5. März 2026
  WEITERE NEWS
Aktuelles aus
L
ibrary
Essentials

In der Ausgabe 02/2026 (März 2026) lesen Sie u.a.:

  • Seniorinnen und Senioren entdecken soziale Netzwerke – Chancen und Aufgaben für Bibliotheken
  • Chatbots im Auskunftsdienst wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken
  • Bibliotheken unter Druck – Was der Hamburger Sparkurs über den Zustand
    des Wissenschaftssystems verrät
  • Die „Big Three“ der Wissenschaftsinformation – Web of Science, Scopus und OpenAlex im systematischen Vergleich
  • Der Strukturwandel im italienischen Buchmarkt – Lehren für Europa,
    die Leseförderung, den Buchhandel
    und Künstliche Intelligenz
  • GenAI in der Hochschulbildung –
    Wer forscht weltweit zu ChatGPT und Co.?
  • Jenseits des Akronyms –
    Wie wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken DEI
    unter politischem Druck neu verankern
  • Kann Bibliotherapie helfen, die Krisen
    der Gegenwart zu bewältigen?
  • Web-Barrierefreiheit pragmatisch umsetzen – Kleine Schritte mit großer Wirkung
  • Wenn die KI die Nachrichten auswählt, verändert sich die öffentliche Wahrnehmung
  • Zwischen Plattformökonomie und kulturellem Gedächtnis – Hat das physische Medium noch eine Zukunft?
u.v.m.
  fachbuchjournal

Transparent peer review (TPR) now standard for all newly
submitted[1] research papers upon publication in Nature

Following successful trial, authors publishing with Nature will now benefit from universal
TPR, enabling greater knowledge sharing and building on principles of open science

Nature, one of the world’s leading scientific journals and part of Springer Nature, has announced a strong step forward in its commitment to research transparency. From this week, all primary research articles submitted to Nature will automatically undergo transparent peer review (TPR) as standard, if they are selected for publication. Making peer review reports and the authors responses openly available alongside the published paper offers greater visibility around scientific discussion and builds on open science principles.

Speaking of the announcement, Nature’s Editor-in-Chief Magdalena Skipper commented:

“The evaluation of research papers by peers prior to their publication is an essential ingredient of disseminating robust and rigorous research. The purpose of peer review is to make the paper better and to help the authors tighten their claims. However, these discussions between the authors and reviewers, guided by the editors, are rarely made visible or reported on. Publishing peer review files offers important benefits for researchers and the wider community. I believe it provides a key insight into the publication process – especially for early-career researchers. We are delighted to now be able to offer universal TPR at Nature and support our authors and community with the benefits this brings.”

The roll out of universal TPR for Nature follows a successful trial and builds on its previous opt-in approach, introduced in 2020, whereby authors could choose if the peer review file was published alongside their research paper. Reviewer identities will remain anonymous unless they choose to disclose them. TPR forms part of a broader set of open peer review practices, and aligns with the wider commitment of Nature’s publisher, Springer Nature, in championing transparency and open sharing in research.

Deborah Sweet, Executive VP, Journals, Nature Portfolio, Springer Nature added:

“Transparency is an increasingly important tool in research. This is central to our commitment to the community and we are working actively to offer transparent peer review even more widely across the broad range of research journals in the Nature Portfolio. By sharing academic exchanges, we can foster greater understanding of how scientific knowledge evolves, build greater trust in science, enable greater knowledge sharing and research data, and support the wider goals of open science.”

Springer Nature has long recognised the benefits of transparency in research publishing. As early as 1999, BMC, began publishing reviewer names and pre-publication histories, Nature Communications has offered TPR as an option since 2016 and has implemented it for all direct submissions since 2022. Many journals in the Nature Portfolio, including Nature, also carry reviewer recognition statements where reviewers can be identified by name if they wish so. In addition, as of early 2024 over a third of Springer Nature’s journal portfolio now benefit from integrated early sharing as preprints and increased transparency in peer review, via its In Review platform.

More information on the policy for Nature can be found here, and wider information across Springer Nature’s journals can be found here. Further discussion on the publishers’ commitment to transparency in research can be found here.

 


[1] Mandatory TPR affects submissions from Monday 16th June.